Affect and persuasion: Mood effects on the processing of message content and context cues and on subsequent behaviour
نویسندگان
چکیده
Two experiments are reported examining the impact of recipients’ mood on the processing of simple, everyday persuasive communications andon subsequent behaviour. Consistent with the general assumption that affective states may inform an individual about the state of its current environment, it was found that positive (as compared to neutral or negative) mood reduced subjects’ motivation to systematically process both content information and contextual cues. Specijically, Experiment I demonstrated that, in a field setting, the behaviour of subjects who had been put in a good mood was less likely to reflect differences in message content than the behaviour of neutral mood subjects. Experiment 2 replicated and extended these findings, showing that good mood subjects’ behaviour was uninfluenced by content as well as context information, whereas bad mood subjects did make use of both types of informution. Subjects’s cognitive responses and evaluations paralleled the behavioural data. The results are discussed in terms of their compatibility with contemporary models of persuasion, and their implications for future research on mood and persuasion and on the interplay of aflect and cognition in general are considered. Addressee for correspondence: Dr Gerd Bohner, Universitat Mannheim, Sozialpsychologie, A 5 , D-6800 Mannheim 1, Federal Republic of Germany. The reported research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grants Str 264/2 to Fritz Strack and Norbert Schwarz, and Schw 27815 to Norbert Schwarz, Herbert Bless and Gerd Bohner). The two experiments reported were conducted by Gerd Bohner as part of his dissertation at the University of Heidelberg, under the supervision of Norbert Schwarz. The authors gratefully acknowledge stimulating discussions with Herbert Bless, Shelly Chaiken, Stefan Hormuth, and Fritz Strack. Thanks are due to Hansjorg Frenzel and Elke Schafer, who served as confederates in Experiment 1. 0046-27721921060511-20$15.00
منابع مشابه
Types of Evidence and Routes to Persuasion: The Unimodel Versus Dual-Process Models
Following the pioneering research of Hovland and his colleagues in the 1950s (e.g., Hovland & Janis, 1959; Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953; Hovland, Lumsdaine, & Sheffield, 1949), social psychologists have proposed a variety of specific “process” models of persuasion to explain how the plethora of source, message, recipient, and context factors produce changes in attitude (for reviews, see Eagly...
متن کاملThe effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
In the present research, the authors examined the effect of a message recipient's power on attitude change and introduced a new mechanism by which power can affect social judgment. In line with prior research that suggested a link between power and approach tendencies, the authors hypothesized that having power increases confidence relative to being powerless. After demonstrating this link in E...
متن کاملThe effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
The present research proposes that sources in the numerical majority (vs. minority) can affect persuasion by influencing the confidence with which people hold their thoughts in response to the persuasive message. Participants received a persuasive message composed of either strong or weak arguments that was presented by a majority or a minority source. Consistent with the self-validation hypoth...
متن کاملFrom Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes
This article provides a brief overview of major developments in the history of contemporary persuasion theory. The first intuitive and empirical approaches to persuasion were guided by main-effect questions (e.g., are experts more persuasive than nonexperts?). Furthermore, researchers focused on only one process by which variables (e.g., emotion, source credibility) would have an impact (e.g., ...
متن کاملHeuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion
In Experiment 1, subjects read a persuasive message from a likable or unlikable communicator who presented six or two arguments concerning one of two topics. High response involvement subjects anticipated discussing the message topic at a future experimental session, whereas low involvement subjects anticipated discussing a different topic. For high involvement subjects, opinion change was sign...
متن کامل